Archive | Libtards RSS feed for this section

Fisking an Idiot

6 May

By now everyone is aware of the jihad attack in Garland, Texas. Two terrorists were just too thin-skinned to allow anyone much less a lowly woman “insult” their so-called god, and thus decided to drive over to a Mohammed-drawing contest and shoot everyone dead. Because they are peaceful like that. Anyway, Sandhya Somashekhar, a “social change reporter” for Washington Post was just not happy about the events and decided to take Pam Geller, the host of said event to task. My response to each paragraph follows thus: *flips the bird*

Event organizer offers no apology after thwarted attack in Texas

No shit, you idiot. She didn’t attempt to kill anyone. She was exercising her rights, just as YOU are exercising YOUR right to write such crap.

Pamela Geller, the woman behind the Texas cartoon contest attacked by two gunmen late Sunday, knew what she was doing when she staged the controversial event featuring irreverent depictions of the prophet Muhammad in Garland, Tex.

Of course she knew!! EVERYONE LIVING IN REALITY KNEW!!! She was making a point sharper than the one on your head: WE WILL NOT BOW TO ISLAM.

The Dallas suburb had hosted a pro-Muslim conference in January, about the time Islamist terrorists killed a dozen journalists with the satirical French publication Charlie Hebdo. Geller, a blogger and fierce critic of what she calls the “Islamization” of America, wanted to make a statement.

Excuse me, but did not the pro-Muslim conference also make a statement? Did they denounce the Charlie Hebdo attacks? No, they had their own agenda complete with ice cream and Maghrib. Your attempt to link their demonstration as a “Stand with Hebdo” shindig is beyond appalling.

So she sponsored the Jihad Watch Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest in the same exhibition hall as the earlier conference. She and her associates invited 200 people and hired 40 heavily armed off-duty police officers and security guards to protect them.

So ask yourself WHY they needed the “heavily-armed” protection if Islam is such a peaceful religion.

If the contest was intended as bait, it worked. Police say two men drove 1,000 miles from Phoenix, shot at a police car outside the event and were quickly killed by one of the hired guards. The shooting has been condemned by Muslim leaders, and Geller, too, has come under fire for staging an event many viewed as purposely provocative.

Bait? BAIT?? Are you fucking kidding me?? She has every fucking RIGHT to hold that contest, and when you think about it, it fucking worked. Two terrorists were flushed out and down the drain, and now ISIS/ ISIL/ IS/ Newest camelfuckers are coming out and claiming to have other terrorists in wait in several states, in our country. The same country that gave them freedom to hold that pro-Muslim shindig.

In an interview with The Washington Post, Geller said she and her fellow organizers were “prepared for violence” this past weekend. In tweets immediately after the shooting, Geller appeared almost gleeful that she had been right.

That is libelous, and this so-called writer should be worried that Geller may sue. Anyone familiar with Twitter knows she was reporting the gunshots, and the casualties. There were no exclamation points, no ” Told ya so!!” and certainly no glee coming from a woman who was the target of an assassination.

The writer goes on to write several paragraphs about Ms. Geller, softly condemning her as a “housewife” and ridiculing her attempts to bring Islam into the light for what it is. She even brought up her “unsuccessful” lawsuit to bring forth the ad campaign: “Killing Jews is Worship that draws us close to Allah.” The one that NYC upheld as being free speech, and which is currently running on MTA buses (MTA has since decided not to display any ads on the buses, because fweelings). Because she uses a Palestinian Authority quote, it is hate speech. What the writer doesn’t realize is that she is right, for the wrong reason. It IS hate speech, but not against Islam. She needs to go change her diaper.

Finally, she gives the last voice to Alia Salem, director for the DFW chapter of CAIR.

Salem said the local Muslim community has been on edge ever since. Controversy has also flared around a private arbitration service for Muslims that opened in Dallas last year — called an Islamic “tribunal” — and in connection with the shooting death of an Iraqi immigrant shot outside his Dallas apartment in March as he photographed his first snowfall.

“The North Texas Muslim community has been very nervous and scared,” Salem said. “Tension has been very high since January.”

As tragic as that death is, the fact remains that the gentleman who was shot and killed was not targeted due to his ethnicity. The fucker just decided to shoot indiscriminately after someone shot at his girlfriend’s apartment. I am a firm believer in that every crime is a hate crime, but as defined by CAIR, this certainly doesn’t meet the requirements. However, I am still waiting for the backlash against Muslim communities that was predicted on 9/12/2001.

The fact that the terrorists PROVED Geller’s point escapes this so-called reporter. Perhaps she will experience some backlash for her stupidity, and think twice about asking a victim to apologize.

Choosing Between Kerosene and Greek Fire

30 Mar

It’s no longer a question of stopping the conflagration. It’s now down to choosing how how fast we burn.

In his television interview, Mr Mottaghi [who has defected and requested asylum] also gave succour to western critics of the proposed nuclear deal, which has seen the White House pursue a more conciliatory line with Tehran than some of America’s European allies in the negotiating team, comprising the five permanent members of the UN security council and Germany.

“The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal,” he said.

In short, Iranian reporter favored by Prez Rouhani defects due to no longer being able to actually perform journalism but also due to facing possible jail time for his frank reporting of the Lausanne shenanigans and outing our administration of colluding with Iran to convince the other European nations to “go along to get along”. On the heels of that bombshell, Iran decided to just up the ante and speed up their nuclear capabilities while Monsewer Kerry smiles on.

The New York Times reported late Sunday that Tehran had backed away from a tentative promise to ship a large portion of its uranium stockpile to Russia, where it could not be used as part of any future weapons program. Western officials insisted to the paper that the uranium did not have to be sent overseas, but could be disposed of in other ways.

[snip]

However, if Iran insists on keeping its uranium in the country, it would undermine a key argument made in favor of the deal by the Obama administration. The Times reports that if the uranium had gone to Russia, it would have been converted into fuel rods, which are difficult to use in nuclear weapons. It is not clear what would happen to the uranium if it remained in Iran.

Oh sure…. Iran may settle for fewer centrifuges, but as long as they get to keep the uranium, what difference, at this point, does it make?

(C’mon… I had to go there.)

Our administration does not have the best interest of our country at heart. Well, I doubt the administration even has a heart, but you know what I mean. They would rather remember Khomeini rather than remember Neda. The Muslim Brotherhood is a friend, and El-Sisi is to be shunned. When Bashar Assad tells 60 Minutes that our Prez is sugar-coating the crisis with the rise of the Islamic State, you know there is a huge problem.

Honestly, I am to the point where I prefer Prez Obama drinking at 9 AM while flying off to a golf course. Seems to me he can do less damage that way.

Show Me Who Your Friends Are, and I’ll Show You Who You Are

3 Mar

Today marks an “historic” occasion. Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, will be addressing a joint session of Congress. It isn’t the first time he has done so, but it is “historic” for one reason only: he was not invited by our es-steamed Prez but by our Speaker, John Boehner. To hear the Democrats tell it, this is such a huge breach of protocol that Netanyahu needs to be censored.

CENSORED!!!

The Prime Minister isn’t here to tell us who to vote for, or with whom to ally ourselves. He is here to warn us of the potential catastrophe that everyone else sees developing in the Middle East. Israel is not alone in seeing the dangers of a nuclear Iran. They are alone in bearing the brunt of its capability, though. But our administration is concerned more with making a deal with a rogue state than it is with keeping an ally safe. In fact, the administration is more concerned with helping to remove Netanyahu from office than with helping a nation survive.

I would like to say that I am surprised, shocked, freaked out by the way the administration is working to undermine a friend of our country. I would like to say it. I can’t, because this is their modus operandi. The only thing that surprises me out of the White House is finding Teh Prez in the Oval Office.

But finding out that 55 Democrats will be boycotting Netanyahu’s speech? Yes, that surprised and even shocked me. And I have one thing to say about it:

Who the hell do you think YOU work for??

You public servants work for us, the PUBLIC, and not this administration. Teh Prez is NOT your boss. In fact, WE are HIS boss. YOU are supposed to represent us and not the whims of a feckless leader who is whining about getting his feelings hurt because he didn’t get the chance to tell Netanyahu “NO”. Don’t give me the “it is a breach of etiquette” excuse or the “so disrespectful to our president” excuse. That doesn’t wash, especially in view of how disrespectful our Prez was leaving Netanyahu to wait for over an hour while he went to have dinner. So shove it and go do you damn job.

Oh, and I have one last thing to say: these are Democrats who are boycotting a Jew and a leader of THE Jewish State. I really hope our Jewish-Americans take note and learn a lesson about voting against your principles.